Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33


69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-610UZ

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S5200 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The S5200 was brought out 3 years later than the SP-600 UZ and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S5200 grades versus the SP-600 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
S5200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Nikon S5200
SP-600 UZ | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
S5200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 has outside dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the S5200 vs the SP-600 UZ.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and SP-600 UZ is 95 and 69 respectively.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The visual below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and SP-600 UZ.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon S5200 to give extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S5200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146g (0.32 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $130 | $189 |