Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
78 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-610UZ
Photography Glossary Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the SP-620 UZ (16MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S5200 was introduced 13 months after the SP-620 UZ which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S5200 grades versus the SP-620 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| S5200 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Nikon S5200
| SP-620 UZ | S5200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
| S5200 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 has got physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the S5200 vs the SP-620 UZ.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S5200 and SP-620 UZ is 95 and 78 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S5200 and SP-620 UZ.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs but you may want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent S5200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lb) | 435 grams (0.96 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $130 | $199 |