Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52707/52707e8927a13c2936528cbc3e374df7d981df72" alt="Nikon Coolpix S5200 front Nikon Coolpix S5200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The S5200 was introduced 3 years prior to the TG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the S5200 grades versus the TG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S5200 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S5200 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus TG-4
S5200 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon S5200
TG-4 | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 26 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus TG-4
S5200 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 has got exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the S5200 vs the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3521/b3521aea87659ac004c643cf1212c5cbd2cf1123" alt="Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S5200 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b556e/b556e7a3a9a180747d9f4cee24d26e223b9999e6" alt="Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S5200 and TG-4.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures but you need to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older S5200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3002b/3002b6406017db41462d3e60814b30c715188611" alt="Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea00f/ea00f4c7f576565957d9061858f923beda0c52ef" alt="Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 images | 380 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-92B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $130 | $379 |