Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S5200 was revealed 2 years after the VR-330 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the S5200 matches up against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus VR-330
| S5200 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon S5200
| VR-330 | S5200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus VR-330
| S5200 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S5200 features outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the S5200 compared to the VR-330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S5200 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and VR-330.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon S5200 to give you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger S5200 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $220 |