Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the S5200 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the S5200 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") have totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S5200 was released 2 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the S5200 scores versus the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus XZ-1
| S5200 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Nikon S5200
| XZ-1 | S5200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus XZ-1
| S5200 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 comes with external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the S5200 compared to the XZ-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and XZ-1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S5200 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Nikon S5200 will render more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern S5200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 gr (0.32 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | 320 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | $567 |