Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
![Nikon Coolpix S5200 front Nikon Coolpix S5200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200/Nikon-S5200-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-50/Ricoh-WG-50-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The S5200 was introduced 5 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the S5200 matches up versus the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S5200 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S5200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Ricoh WG-50
S5200 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Nikon S5200
WG-50 | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 52 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Ricoh WG-50
S5200 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S5200 has got outside dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the S5200 compared to the WG-50.
![Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S5200 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and WG-50.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos but you may want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged S5200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | On, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 images | 300 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $130 | $280 |