Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200
95 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
![Nikon Coolpix S5200 front Nikon Coolpix S5200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200/Nikon-S5200-front.jpg)
![Samsung PL200 front Samsung PL200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-PL200/Samsung-PL200-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The S5200 was introduced 2 years later than the PL200 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S5200 scores versus the PL200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S5200 and Samsung PL200. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Samsung PL200
S5200 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Nikon S5200
PL200 | S5200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Samsung PL200
S5200 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S5200 offers external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the S5200 vs the PL200.
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-PL200-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and PL200 is 95 and 94 respectively.
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-PL200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S5200 and PL200.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon S5200 to give you extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer S5200 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-PL200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-PL200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Samsung PL200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 gr (0.32 pounds) | 170 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | BP70A |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $130 | $0 |