Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Nikon S5200 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S5200 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S5200 was launched 4 years after the SL202 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S5200 matches up against the SL202 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Samsung SL202
| S5200 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 49 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Nikon S5200
| SL202 | S5200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Samsung SL202
| S5200 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S5200 comes with outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S5200 versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the S5200 against the SL202.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S5200 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The image below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and SL202.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Nikon S5200 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer S5200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $140 |