Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
![Nikon Coolpix S5200 front Nikon Coolpix S5200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200/Nikon-S5200-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB35F/Samsung-WB35F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The S5200 was introduced 11 months earlier than the WB35F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the S5200 matches up versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Samsung WB35F
S5200 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon S5200
WB35F | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 11 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Samsung WB35F
S5200 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 provides outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the S5200 compared to the WB35F.
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-WB35F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S5200 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-WB35F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S5200 and WB35F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older S5200 will be behind in sensor tech.
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-WB35F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S5200-vs-Samsung-WB35F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S5200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | BP70A |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $130 | $130 |