Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the S5300 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S5300 was manufactured 4 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the S5300 scores versus the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S5300 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S5300 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| S5300 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Nikon S5300
| Tough-3000 | S5300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus Tough-3000
| S5300 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S5300 enjoys physical dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the S5300 vs the Tough-3000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5300 and Tough-3000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S5300 and Tough-3000.
All in all, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon S5300 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern S5300 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 138 grams (0.30 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $180 | $0 |