Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Nikon S5300 and Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S5300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S5300 was unveiled 3 years later than the TG-310 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the S5300 scores vs the TG-310 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S5300 and Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S5300 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus TG-310
| S5300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon S5300
| TG-310 | S5300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus TG-310
| S5300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S5300 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S5300 and Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the S5300 against the TG-310.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5300 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S5300 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S5300 to produce extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer S5300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 138g (0.30 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 150 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $180 | $0 |