Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2de4f/2de4feb2b30bf5885814e58b74c1e3c4f2bd149e" alt="Nikon Coolpix S5300 front Nikon Coolpix S5300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the S5300 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The S5300 was released 24 months later than the TG-820 iHS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the S5300 grades versus the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5300 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S5300 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
S5300 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon S5300
TG-820 iHS | S5300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
S5300 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5300 comes with external measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the S5300 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e316/3e3168ac696a3b24383b2c5ec3c6ed21fc4f9599" alt="Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S5300 and TG-820 iHS is 95 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/586a3/586a3d97efd97a80eefce8ce41dbcdd279192b7b" alt="Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The graphic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S5300 and TG-820 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S5300 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer S5300 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8feca/8fecad0bddf5d54902b50aa32f106aff0abc8b7e" alt="Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fbad/7fbad218f0fa23dad818b4424023c151c2da8204" alt="Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 138 grams (0.30 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 images | 220 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $180 | $500 |