Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-4

Following is a extensive review of the Nikon S5300 versus Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The resolution of the S5300 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S5300 was brought out about the same time to the WG-4 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S5300 grades versus the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5300 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S5300 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.

If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S5300 enjoys outer measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Contrast the Nikon S5300 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the S5300 vs the WG-4.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S5300 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.

Quite often, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S5300 and WG-4.

Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs however you need to take the launch date of the products into consideration.