Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Nikon S5300 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S5300 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S5300 was unveiled 8 months prior to the WG-M1 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S5300 scores versus the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S5300 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Nikon S5300 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S5300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon S5300
| WG-M1 | S5300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2014 | Newer by 8 months |
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Ricoh WG-M1
| S5300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S5300 comes with outer dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S5300 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the S5300 compared to the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5300 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S5300 and WG-M1.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S5300 to produce extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S5300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S5300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 138 grams (0.30 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $2,000 |