Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Nikon Coolpix S570 front Nikon Coolpix S570 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S570/Nikon-S570-front.jpg)
![Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-4/Olympus-TG-4-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 140g - 92 x 57 x 22mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Nikon S570 versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the S570 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The S570 was announced 6 years before the TG-4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the S570 grades versus the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S570 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S570 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S570 over the Olympus TG-4
S570 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon S570
TG-4 | S570 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S570 and Olympus TG-4
S570 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S570 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Nikon S570 versus Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the S570 versus the TG-4.
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-4-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S570 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-4-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S570 and TG-4.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-4 to produce extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged S570 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-4-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-Tough-TG-4-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S570 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S570 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-08-04 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.7-6.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 57 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL10 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $180 | $379 |