Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Nikon Coolpix S570 front Nikon Coolpix S570 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S570/Nikon-S570-front.jpg)
![Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-330/Olympus-VR-330-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 140g - 92 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Nikon S570 versus Olympus VR-330, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S570 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The S570 was announced 18 months prior to the VR-330 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the S570 matches up vs the VR-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S570 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S570 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S570 over the Olympus VR-330
S570 | VR-330 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon S570
VR-330 | S570 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S570 and Olympus VR-330
S570 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S570 has physical dimensions of 92mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S570 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the S570 and the VR-330.
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-VR-330-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S570 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-VR-330-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S570 and VR-330.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The older S570 will be behind in sensor technology.
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-VR-330-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S570-vs-Olympus-VR-330-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S570 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S570 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S570 | Olympus VR-330 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-08-04 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.7-6.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 57 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | EN-EL10 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $180 | $220 |