Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
![Nikon Coolpix S6000 front Nikon Coolpix S6000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6000/Nikon-S6000-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB35F/Samsung-WB35F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.7-5.6) lens
- 156g - 97 x 55 x 25mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S6000 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S6000 was released 4 years earlier than the WB35F and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the S6000 grades vs the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6000 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S6000 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6000 over the Samsung WB35F
S6000 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon S6000
WB35F | S6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S6000 and Samsung WB35F
S6000 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6000 offers outer dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the S6000 compared to the WB35F.
![Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6000-vs-Samsung-WB35F-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S6000 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6000-vs-Samsung-WB35F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6000 and WB35F.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to give more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older S6000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6000-vs-Samsung-WB35F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6000-vs-Samsung-WB35F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6000 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6000 | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-02-03 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.7-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 156g (0.34 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $130 |