Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 120g - 90 x 53 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Nikon S620 and Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the S620 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe S620 was revealed 7 years before the TG-4 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S620 grades against the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S620 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S620 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S620 over the Olympus TG-4
| S620 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon S620
| TG-4 | S620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 75 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S620 and Olympus TG-4
| S620 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S620 offers physical dimensions of 90mm x 53mm x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Nikon S620 and Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the S620 compared to the TG-4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S620 and TG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The picture below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S620 and TG-4.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to result in extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged S620 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S620 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S620 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S620 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-02-03 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 53 x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $37 | $379 |