Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 120g - 90 x 53 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S620 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S620 was announced 3 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the S620 grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S620 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S620 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S620 over the Olympus VR-320
| S620 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S620
| VR-320 | S620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 29 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320
| S620 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S620 provides physical measurements of 90mm x 53mm x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the S620 against the VR-320.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S620 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S620 and VR-320.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older S620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S620 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S620 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-02-03 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 53 x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $37 | $179 |