Clicky

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Nikon Coolpix S620 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon S620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
  • 120g - 90 x 53 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S620 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The S620 was announced 3 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the S620 grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Nikon S620 over the Olympus VR-320

 S620 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S620

 VR-320 S620 
RevealedJuly 2011February 2009Fresher by 29 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320

 S620 VR-320 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S620 provides physical measurements of 90mm x 53mm x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the S620 against the VR-320.

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S620 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S620 and VR-320.

As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older S620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S620 Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
20
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Nikon S620 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Street photography advice
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (120g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon S620
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
46
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Nikon S620 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
62
lighter than competition (120 grams)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
69
lighter than competition (158 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S620 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography details
32
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
41
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S620 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging info
31
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (120 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic socket
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Nikon S620 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S620 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix S620Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S620 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-02-03 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/2.7-5.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 2cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 120 gr (0.26 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 90 x 53 x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID EN-EL12 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (3 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $37 $179