Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Nikon S6200 and Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S6200 was revealed 2 years after the FE-4000 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the S6200 matches up against the FE-4000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Olympus FE-4000. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus FE-4000
| S6200 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 26 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Nikon S6200
| FE-4000 | S6200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus FE-4000
| S6200 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S6200 offers exterior dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S6200 and Olympus FE-4000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the S6200 compared to the FE-4000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S6200 and FE-4000 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The image below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and FE-4000.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Nikon S6200 to show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher S6200 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also called | - | X-925 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 136 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $229 | $130 |