Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38


72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The S6200 was announced 2 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S6200 matches up versus the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
S6200 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Nikon S6200
SP-565UZ | S6200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus SP-565UZ
S6200 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S6200 provides outer measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the S6200 and the SP-565UZ.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S6200 and SP-565UZ is 94 and 72 respectively.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S6200 to provide more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern S6200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $229 | $400 |