Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Nikon S6200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S6200 was launched 19 months later than the SP-800 UZ which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S6200 matches up against the SP-800 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| S6200 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 19 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Nikon S6200
| SP-800 UZ | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| S6200 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S6200 has got exterior dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S6200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the S6200 and the SP-800 UZ.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and SP-800 UZ is 94 and 69 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S6200 and SP-800 UZ.
Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S6200 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher S6200 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 12 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $229 | $270 |