Clicky

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
94
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38
Nikon Coolpix S6200 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Nikon S6200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
  • 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

In this write-up, we are comparing the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The S6200 was introduced 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the S6200 matches up versus the 9000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus 9000

 S6200 9000 
IntroducedAugust 2011May 2009More modern by 28 months
Manual focus More precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Nikon S6200

 9000 S6200 

Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus 9000

 S6200 9000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display size
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 has got physical measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Look at the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the S6200 against the 9000.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and 9000.

All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon S6200 to offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer S6200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S6200 Portrait photography information
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
40
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
20
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Nikon S6200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
63
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus via touch
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competitors (225g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon S6200
Sports photography with Olympus 9000
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
low fps (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Nikon S6200 Travel photography advice
Olympus 9000 Travel photography advice
70
includes focus via touch
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (250mm)
missing Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
58
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (225g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S6200
Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
43
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
31
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S6200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
31
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
27
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not have selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S6200 and Olympus 9000
 Nikon Coolpix S6200Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S6200 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called as - mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-08-24 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Expeed C2 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 50
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-250mm (10.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.6 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 2.7"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160 grams (0.35 lbs) 225 grams (0.50 lbs)
Dimensions 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 250 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 -
Self timer Yes Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $229 $300