Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S6200 was brought out 20 months after the Tough-3000 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the S6200 scores against the Tough-3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| S6200 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 20 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Nikon S6200
| Tough-3000 | S6200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus Tough-3000
| S6200 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S6200 comes with outside dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the S6200 compared to the Tough-3000.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and Tough-3000 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S6200 to resolve extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The younger S6200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Other name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-08-24 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $229 | $0 |