Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/292b2/292b2c6c9e9941132d053297f7f0eb80dc6bf8c6" alt="Nikon Coolpix S6200 front Nikon Coolpix S6200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The S6200 was revealed 2 years later than the 8000 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S6200 grades against the 8000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus 8000
S6200 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 27 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Nikon S6200
8000 | S6200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus 8000
S6200 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6200 has exterior measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the S6200 vs the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84efb/84efbf546e02ae9cad7de7303f5907b3356d1185" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6200 and 8000 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86384/86384c5635569cbd116b3608476f935b99c28154" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6200 and 8000.
All in all, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S6200 to give you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger S6200 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eca9c/eca9ce5f0bf346e373d53d29bee123c6f7a6016a" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db847/db8476a3b6a8b5a1730384a4d768390f2d9bec4a" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Alternative name | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 182 grams (0.40 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $229 | $380 |