Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S6200 was manufactured 16 months prior to the TG-630 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S6200 scores vs the TG-630 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S6200 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Nikon S6200
| TG-630 iHS | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S6200 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S6200 provides external dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the S6200 versus the TG-630 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and TG-630 iHS is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S6200 to result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older S6200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 220 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $229 | $200 |