Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S6200 was unveiled 3 years before the TG-3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S6200 grades versus the TG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus TG-3
| S6200 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Nikon S6200
| TG-3 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 | August 2011 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-3
| S6200 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6200 provides external dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the S6200 compared to the TG-3.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S6200 and TG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S6200 and TG-3.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs although you should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older S6200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $229 | $350 |