Clicky

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
37
Overall
37
Nikon Coolpix S6200 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Nikon S6200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
  • 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
  • Launched August 2011
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Here is a comprehensive review of the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The S6200 was introduced 4 months before the VR-340 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the S6200 matches up versus the VR-340 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus VR-340

 S6200 VR-340 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon S6200

 VR-340 S6200 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus VR-340

 S6200 VR-340 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2012Same generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S6200 comes with outside dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the S6200 compared to the VR-340.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S6200 and VR-340.

As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photographs but you may want to take the production date of the cameras into account.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S6200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography advice
39
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
has face detection focusing
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
34
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Nikon S6200 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Street photography highlights
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
has touch to focus
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (125g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Nikon S6200 Sports photography details
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography details
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Nikon S6200 Travel photography features
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography features
70
has touch to focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
very long zoom (250mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
68
lighter than others in class (125g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S6200 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography details
42
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
42
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S6200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
31
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
33
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than others in class (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S6200 and Olympus VR-340
 Nikon Coolpix S6200Olympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S6200 Olympus VR-340
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-08-24 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed C2 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-250mm (10.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.6 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160 grams (0.35 pounds) 125 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 250 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 LI-50B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $229 $130