Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S6200 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S6200 was unveiled 16 months before the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S6200 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S6200 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S6200
XZ-2 iHS | S6200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | August 2011 | More recent by 16 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S6200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S6200 enjoys external dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the S6200 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S6200 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S6200 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Nikon S6200 will show greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older S6200 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-08-24 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $229 | $450 |