Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Panasonic. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S6200 was revealed 3 years before the ZS35 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the S6200 scores vs the ZS35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Panasonic ZS35
| S6200 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Nikon S6200
| ZS35 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | August 2011 | Fresher by 28 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Panasonic ZS35
| S6200 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S6200 offers physical measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the S6200 and the ZS35.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and ZS35 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and ZS35.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of photographs although you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older S6200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S6200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $229 | $300 |