Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Photography Glossary Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the S6200 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S6200 was announced at a similar time to the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S6200 scores vs the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| S6200 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Nikon S6200
| GR Digital IV | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| S6200 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | September 2011 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6200 offers exterior dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S6200 and the GR Digital IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S6200 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S6200 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Nikon S6200 will result in greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2011-09-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 390 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $229 | $599 |
