Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
![Nikon Coolpix S6200 front Nikon Coolpix S6200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6200/Nikon-S6200-front.jpg)
![Ricoh PX front Ricoh PX front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-PX/Ricoh-PX-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the PX (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The S6200 was released at a similar time to the PX and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S6200 matches up vs the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Ricoh PX
S6200 | PX |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Nikon S6200
PX | S6200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh PX
S6200 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2011 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 features external measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh PX in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the S6200 compared to the PX.
![Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX size comparison Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-vs-Ricoh-PX-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and PX is 94 and 95 respectively.
![Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-vs-Ricoh-PX-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and PX.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
![Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-vs-Ricoh-PX-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-vs-Ricoh-PX-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh PX |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed C2 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3072 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $229 | $329 |