Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Ricoh. The resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S6200 was introduced 3 years before the WG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the S6200 grades against the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Ricoh WG-4
| S6200 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Nikon S6200
| WG-4 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | August 2011 | More recent by 29 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh WG-4
| S6200 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6200 offers exterior measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the S6200 vs the WG-4.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6200 and WG-4.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos but you should always consider the release date of the products into consideration. The older S6200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $229 | $330 |