Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very similar and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S6200 was brought out 3 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the S6200 grades versus the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| S6200 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon S6200
| WG-4 GPS | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | August 2011 | Fresher by 29 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| S6200 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 features physical measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the S6200 versus the WG-4 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures however you should always consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older S6200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $229 | $210 |