Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-6
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Ricoh. The resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S6200 was brought out 4 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S6200 scores vs the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| S6200 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Nikon S6200
| WG-5 GPS | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 | August 2011 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| S6200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6200 enjoys outer dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Nikon S6200 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the S6200 and the WG-5 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and WG-5 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S6200 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you really should take the production date of the products into consideration. The older S6200 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S6200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $229 | $500 |