Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S6200 was introduced 2 months after the WB210 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the S6200 matches up vs the WB210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Samsung WB210
| S6200 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 1k | Clearer display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Nikon S6200
| WB210 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Samsung WB210
| S6200 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 | July 2011 | Similar age | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S6200 enjoys outside measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the S6200 versus the WB210.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and WB210 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and WB210.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S6200 to offer greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively.
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-08-24 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $229 | $279 |