Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
![Nikon Coolpix S630 front Nikon Coolpix S630 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S630/Nikon-S630-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB35F/Samsung-WB35F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 140g - 97 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Nikon S630 versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the S630 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The S630 was revealed 5 years before the WB35F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S630 scores vs the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S630 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S630 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S630 over the Samsung WB35F
S630 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon S630
WB35F | S630 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 59 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon S630 and Samsung WB35F
S630 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S630 comes with physical dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S630 versus Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S630 versus the WB35F.
![Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Samsung-WB35F-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S630 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Samsung-WB35F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S630 and WB35F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older S630 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Samsung-WB35F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Samsung-WB35F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S630 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S630 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-02-03 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-260mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | EN-L12 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $240 | $130 |