Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
![Nikon Coolpix S6300 front Nikon Coolpix S6300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300/Nikon-S6300-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S810c front Nikon Coolpix S810c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c/Nikon-S810c-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed April 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Nikon S6300 and Nikon S810c, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Nikon. The image resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the S810c (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S6300 was introduced 3 years earlier than the S810c which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S6300 scores against the S810c in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Nikon Coolpix S810c. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Nikon S810c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Nikon S810c
S6300 | S810c |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Nikon S6300
S810c | S6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 26 months |
Display size | 3.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Nikon S810c
S6300 | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S6300 comes with external dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Nikon S810c has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S6300 and Nikon S810c in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the S6300 versus the S810c.
![Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c size comparison Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S6300 and S810c is 94 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c top view buttons comparison Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6300 and S810c.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you might want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged S6300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c sensor size comparison Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Nikon S810c Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Nikon Coolpix S810c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Nikon Coolpix S810c |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 216 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | 270 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | EN-EL23 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $200 | $350 |