Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1
94 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Nikon S6300 and Olympus SH-1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S6300 was introduced 3 years earlier than the SH-1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S6300 scores against the SH-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus SH-1
| S6300 | SH-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Nikon S6300
| SH-1 | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 26 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus SH-1
| S6300 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S6300 enjoys outer measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S6300 and Olympus SH-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the S6300 vs the SH-1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S6300 and SH-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The photograph below may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6300 and SH-1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you should really factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older S6300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 380 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $349 |