Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10
94 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S6300 versus Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the S6300 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S6300 was introduced 12 months prior to the XZ-10 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the S6300 grades against the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S6300 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon S6300
| XZ-10 | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus XZ-10
| S6300 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6300 comes with physical dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6300 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the S6300 versus the XZ-10.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6300 and XZ-10 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S6300 and XZ-10.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon S6300 to produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older S6300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-01 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $428 |