Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a6d5/6a6d5d484176077651540443ac4c72ece0e4fead" alt="Nikon Coolpix S6300 front Nikon Coolpix S6300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Nikon S6300 and Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The S6300 was brought out 14 months later than the TG-310 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the S6300 scores vs the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus TG-310
S6300 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon S6300
TG-310 | S6300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus TG-310
S6300 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6300 features outside measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6300 and Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S6300 versus the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9970e/9970ed0fd9bb66583cd94bf4f00a5005c54c8184" alt="Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6300 and TG-310 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33277/3327789cd5542e421a900024d46c3854a3828ec9" alt="Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S6300 and TG-310.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S6300 to provide extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S6300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ade0a/ade0a01fb182ffb7e4e403264e730c40ebe5d8c1" alt="Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18eaa/18eaa3a3c18a265c9aac4c9966bd1ec34db5f35a" alt="Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus TG-310 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-02-01 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | 150 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $200 | $0 |