Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Nikon S6300 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S6300 was announced 7 months after the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the S6300 scores vs the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6300 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S6300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus VR-320
S6300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | July 2011 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S6300
VR-320 | S6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus VR-320
S6300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S6300 features outside dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Nikon S6300 and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the S6300 vs the VR-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6300 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The image underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S6300 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon S6300 to give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger S6300 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $200 | $179 |