Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Nikon S6300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the S6300 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S6300 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe S6300 was released 10 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the S6300 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S6300 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S6300 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S6300
XZ-2 iHS | S6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2012 | Newer by 10 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S6300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S6300 provides outer dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S6300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the S6300 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S6300 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S6300 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S6300 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Nikon S6300 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S6300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-01 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | 340 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $200 | $450 |