Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
![Nikon Coolpix S6300 front Nikon Coolpix S6300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300/Nikon-S6300-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB350F/Samsung-WB350F-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Nikon S6300 and Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S6300 was manufactured 23 months before the WB350F making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the S6300 matches up versus the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Samsung WB350F
S6300 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Nikon S6300
WB350F | S6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 23 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Samsung WB350F
S6300 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S6300 offers outside dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S6300 and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the S6300 vs the WB350F.
![Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Samsung-WB350F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S6300 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.
![Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Samsung-WB350F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S6300 and WB350F.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images however you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged S6300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Samsung-WB350F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-vs-Samsung-WB350F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Samsung WB350F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $200 | $260 |