Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Nikon S6300 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S6300 was manufactured 23 months before the WB35F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S6300 matches up vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6300 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S6300 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Samsung WB35F
| S6300 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon S6300
| WB35F | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 23 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Samsung WB35F
| S6300 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S6300 comes with outer dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S6300 versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the S6300 versus the WB35F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S6300 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S6300 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of pictures however you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged S6300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $130 |