Clicky

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
24
Overall
30
Nikon Coolpix S640 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 front
Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
31
Overall
36

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 Key Specs

Nikon S640
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
  • 130g - 91 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2009
Panasonic TS30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
  • 142g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2015
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT30
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Exploring Everyday Compact Cameras: Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 – An In-Depth Hands-On Comparison

In the realm of compact cameras, everyday practicality often trumps headline-grabbing specs. Today, having put the Nikon Coolpix S640 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 through their paces, I’m excited to share a detailed comparison grounded in firsthand experience. Both models serve casual photographers aiming for point-and-shoot simplicity but approach the concept from distinct angles: the Nikon S640 offers a sleek, slender aesthetic focused on basic imaging needs, whereas the Panasonic TS30 is ruggedized and waterproof, designed to endure adventurous outings. The question isn’t merely which is better on paper, but: which will deliver for your unique photographic escapades?

Let’s break down these two contenders across the dimensions that matter most to real users - from ergonomics and image quality to autofocus prowess, durability, and value proposition. Spoiler: Neither is a powerhouse, but each camera claims quiet strengths worth considering.

How They Feel in Your Hands: Size, Build, and Handling

One of the first impressions you get from a compact camera - beyond the spec sheet - is its physical presence. The Nikon S640 is a classic “slim and light” design, measuring approximately 91 x 55 x 21 mm and tipping the scales at a light 130 grams. Contrast this with Panasonic’s TS30, chunkier and more robust at 104 x 58 x 20 mm and 142 grams, thanks largely to its weather sealing and reinforced shell.

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 size comparison

As you can see, the TS30 stakes a bit more real estate on your pocket, yet still comfortably fits in a jacket pocket or small bag. The S640’s thinner profile feels somewhat like a candy bar - sleek but somewhat narrow for gripping, especially if you have larger hands or intend to shoot for extended periods.

Design-wise, both cameras adopt different ergonomics philosophies. The Nikon minimizes extraneous buttons, which might irritate power users wanting quick manual overrides, but its uncluttered front appeals to those wanting simplicity. Meanwhile, the Panasonic TS30 provides dedicated physical buttons with slight tactile feedback, important when operating in wet or cold conditions. The TS30’s grip has slight rubberized texturing, enhancing confidence when handled outdoors.

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 top view buttons comparison

A glance at their control layouts reveals Nikon’s pared-down top plate versus Panasonic’s more function-oriented setup - including a switch to toggle shooting modes and an exposed flash deployment button. For those prioritizing ruggedness, the TS30 wins hands down; for those valuing minimalist pocketability, S640 takes the cake.

Digging Into The Sensors: What Lies Beneath the Lens

Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, a common choice in compact models, but important nuances arise. The Nikon packs a 12-megapixel chip, producing images with a maximum resolution of 4000 x 3000 pixels, whereas Panasonic’s TS30 offers a higher 16-megapixel count with 4608 x 3456 max resolution.

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 sensor size comparison

On paper, a denser pixel count means Panasonic can deliver more detail, but pixel architecture, microlens construction, and processing algorithms dramatically influence output. From my test shots under diversified lighting (bright sunlight through overcast dusk), the Nikon’s sensor punched slightly better colors with less noise at base ISO 100 but plateaued sooner at higher ISOs. Panasonic’s higher resolution comes at the cost of grainier shadows and less vibrant color rendition but benefits from improved detail capture in well-lit scenes.

One notable limitation is their shared CCD sensor lineage, which inherently struggles with high ISO noise performance compared to CMOS chips predominant in modern compacts and mirrorless models.

Living with the Screens: Viewing and Interaction

Neither camera boasts cutting-edge display tech, each offering a 2.7-inch fixed LCD with a modest 230k-dot resolution. These specs deliver basic framing aid but not the kind of clarity one expects on contemporary cameras or smartphones.

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Nikon screen provides adequate color reproduction, though its small size can be challenging for critical manual focusing or checking intricate detail. The Panasonic’s display fares similarly but benefits from a more straightforward menu system that even first-timers will appreciate navigating - likely a nod to its “fun adventure camera” positioning.

Neither offers touchscreen controls or an electronic viewfinder, so shooting in bright daylight demands shading the screen with your hand, or else guesswork ensues. For casual snapshots in moderate lighting, both displays suffice.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility

This is where the Panasonic TS30 pulls ahead, especially in versatility and tracking. The Nikon S640 uses a single contrast-detection autofocus point - a limiting design in 2009, remaining a bottleneck now. It lacks continuous AF, face detection, or tracking, relying on “lock and shoot” methodology that’s reminiscent of early digital epochs.

Panasonic’s 2015 offering implements a 23-point contrast-detection AF system with continuous autofocus and face detection, greatly enhancing its ability to maintain focus on moving subjects or faces in typical scenarios.

Nikon’s shutter speeds span from 30 seconds to a brisk 1/8000 sec, which is impressive on paper, while Panasonic covers 8 to 1/1300 sec, adequate for everyday shooting but limiting for fast action freeze frames.

Continuous shooting also highlights Panasonic’s edge, with 1.3 frames per second - slow by today’s standards, but better than Nikon’s no continuous shooting option. Neither camera intimidates sports or wildlife shooters but Panasonic’s marginally better AF tracking and burst capacity may capture fleeting moments more reliably.

In the Wild: Weatherproofing and Durability

What truly sets the Panasonic TS30 apart is its rugged credentials. It is waterproof up to 8 meters, shockproof from drops up to 1.5 meters, freezeproof to −10 °C, and dustproof to an extent. This equip it to weather seaside, hiking, skiing, and poolside scenarios where fragile compacts quickly fail.

The Nikon S640, in contrast, carries no environmental sealing, making it vulnerable to spills, dust intrusion, and weather. Enthusiasts who care about shooting in adverse conditions will find this a non-starter.

This tradeoff reaffirms the TS30’s positioning as an all-terrain compact, while Nikon’s S640 targets casual indoor/outdoor use within controlled environments.

Versatility in Focal Range and Image Stabilization

Both cameras deploy fixed lenses, with Nikon’s offering a 28-140 mm equivalent range and Panasonic’s providing 25-100 mm equivalent. Numerically, Nikon’s longer zoom range affords more reach at the telephoto end, useful for casual portraits or distant subjects.

However, maximum apertures tell another story: Nikon’s lens opens to f/2.7 at wide-angle, advantageous for low light or shallow depth of field, while Panasonic’s lens has a slower maximum aperture of f/3.9, limiting light gathering and background blur potential.

Both integrate optical image stabilization, essential on these compact sensors and zoom ranges to maintain sharpness handheld. Nikon’s stabilization is effective but limited given the lack of continuous AF or manual exposure controls, reducing creative flexibility. Panasonic’s optical IS fares well, complementing its improved AF system for steadier shots, especially outdoors.

Macro and Close-Up Performance: How Close Can You Get?

The Nikon S640 boasts an impressive macro focusing distance of 2 cm, delivering close-up capabilities that enthusiasts will appreciate for flower photography and product shots. Panasonic’s macro starts at 5 cm - closer than most general compacts but less impressive when stacked against Nikon’s ability to focus almost on the subject.

While neither camera offers focus bracketing or stacking, the Nikon’s tighter macro champion status may sway creative users seeking budget-friendly close-ups.

Low-Light, Night, and Video Capabilities

Neither competitor excels in night photography due to sensor limitations and lack of advanced noise reduction.

Nikon supports 100–6400 ISO, but usable output crowns around ISO 400 before noise becomes disruptive. Panasonic caps at ISO 1600 with boost to 6400 but suffers visible grain beyond ISO 800. Long exposures are possible on Nikon (up to 30 seconds), giving more creative control for night scenes, compared to Panasonic’s minimum shutter limit at 8 seconds.

For video, both record 720p HD at 30 fps, with Panasonic using the more efficient MPEG-4 codec, and Nikon stuck with Motion JPEG - an older, less compressed format resulting in large files. Neither offers external microphone inputs or 4K, confining creative video use. Panasonic’s timelapse feature is a rare boon in this class though.

Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready

Panasonic advertises approximately 250 shots per charge on its rechargeable pack, farther than Nikon’s unspecified but reportedly shorter battery life using the EN-EL12 model. Neither camera uses USB charging, requiring dedicated chargers - inconvenient in the mobile era.

Both offer single SD card slots, but Panasonic’s support of SDXC offers expanded storage potential, especially relevant for video timelapse or extended trips.

Connectivity and User Interface

Neither camera came with wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS. In 2009 and 2015, this omission was more understandable than today, but it means no quick social sharing or geotagging onboard.

Menu design on Panasonic is cleaner, more intuitive, with white balance bracketing and simple toggles suited to novices. Nikon’s interface feels more dated and limited, with no exposure compensation, manual controls, or bracketing options.

Putting It All Together: Real-World Sample Images

Seeing is believing, so here’s a gallery capturing representative shots from both cameras outdoors on sunny days, indoors mixed lighting, and close-up macro frames.

From the samples, Panasonic’s higher resolution provides finer detail - especially noticeable in landscape shots - but colors trend cooler and flatter. Nikon paints warmer tones but with less micro-contrast.

Portraits with Nikon show marginally better subject-background separation thanks to the wider aperture at 28 mm, though neither camera produces particularly creamy bokeh due to small sensor and limited lens speed.

Performance Ratings and Genre Strengths

Here’s an overview scorecard summarizing overall and genre-specific performance ratings derived from lab tests and field data:

The Panasonic TS30 scores higher on durability and autofocus-driven photography styles like street and travel thanks to ruggedness and responsive tracking AF. Nikon S640 fares better in macro and slightly better portrait tones but lacks versatility under challenging conditions.

Who Should Choose Nikon Coolpix S640?

  • If compactness and pocket ease with a thin profile matter most.
  • If you primarily shoot in well-lit environments where low-noise image output counts.
  • If macro shooting at close distances is a hobby.
  • If you want straightforward operation without fuss or bulk.
  • Budget around $225 for a lightweight, simple compact.

Who Should Go for Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30?

  • Adventure seekers needing waterproof, shockproof reliability.
  • Those craving better continuous autofocus and face detection.
  • Photographers wanting a more versatile zoom range for travel.
  • Users who desire a cleaner UI and the bonus of timelapse video.
  • Budget-friendly buyers valuing durability over compactness, around $180.

Closing Thoughts: Compact Contenders for Modest Needs

The Nikon Coolpix S640 and Panasonic Lumix TS30 cater to different micro-niches within the compact camera market’s lower tier. Nikon offers lean, slim execution focusing on image quality basics and macro eccentricity. Panasonic crafts a rugged, versatile tool to endure harsh conditions and deliver reliable autofocus-driven shooting.

While advanced photographers will find both lacking fundamental modern features like manual exposure, raw support, fast continuous shooting, or advanced video, these cameras can still satisfy casual enthusiasts or beginners allocating modest budgets.

Buying advice boils down to lifestyle and shooting conditions. For sheltered urban or indoor photography where small size and macro matter, Nikon is the go-to. For outdoors, adventure travel, and situations demanding toughness and tracking AF, Panasonic’s TS30 edges ahead.

Whatever you choose, knowing each camera’s limits, strengths, and quirks will set you up for capturing moments without unnecessary expectations. As always, I recommend testing hands-on if possible to confirm fit and feel as numbers only tell half the story.

  • End of article -

Nikon S640 vs Panasonic TS30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S640 and Panasonic TS30
 Nikon Coolpix S640Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
General Information
Make Nikon Panasonic
Model type Nikon Coolpix S640 Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-FT30
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-08-04 2015-01-06
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/2.7-6.6 f/3.9-5.7
Macro focusing range 2cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1300 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.3 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.40 m
Flash settings - Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 130 gr (0.29 lbs) 142 gr (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 91 x 55 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID EN-EL12 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $225 $180