Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
![Nikon Coolpix S6400 front Nikon Coolpix S6400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400/Nikon-S6400-front.jpg)
![Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-145/Olympus-VG-145-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S6400 (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The S6400 was launched 14 months later than the VG-145 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S6400 grades against the VG-145 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6400 and Olympus VG-145. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S6400 Gallery and Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Olympus VG-145
S6400 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 14 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Nikon S6400
VG-145 | S6400 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6400 and Olympus VG-145
S6400 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S6400 offers outer measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the S6400 compared to the VG-145.
![Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Olympus-VG-145-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S6400 and VG-145 is 94 and 96 respectively.
![Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Olympus-VG-145-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6400 and VG-145.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Nikon S6400 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent S6400 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
![Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Olympus-VG-145-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Olympus-VG-145-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6400 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | Olympus VG-145 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-08-22 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) | 120 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 shots | 160 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $500 | $0 |