Nikon S6500 vs Panasonic FZ60

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Nikon S6500 vs Panasonic FZ60, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Panasonic. The resolution of the S6500 (16MP) and the FZ60 (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S6500 was launched 6 months after the FZ60 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Nikon S6500 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ60 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the S6500 grades against the FZ60 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S6500 Gallery & Panasonic FZ60 Gallery.

In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon S6500 provides exterior dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ60 has sizing of 120mm x 81mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") and a weight of 493 grams (1.09 lbs).

Analyze the Nikon S6500 vs Panasonic FZ60 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the S6500 against the FZ60.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S6500 and FZ60 is 92 and 68 respectively.

Generally, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S6500 and FZ60.

As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images though you should really factor the age of the products into consideration.