Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Nikon S6900 and Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Nikon and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the S6900 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the S6900 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S6900 was brought out 5 years later than the FS42 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S6900 matches up against the FS42 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S6900 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Panasonic FS42
S6900 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | April 2009 | Fresher by 71 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Nikon S6900
FS42 | S6900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6900 and Panasonic FS42
S6900 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6900 offers external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S6900 and Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the S6900 against the FS42.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S6900 and FS42 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6900 and FS42.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S6900 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Nikon S6900 will result in extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher S6900 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6900 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 grams (0.40 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $190 | $580 |