Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
![Nikon Coolpix S6900 front Nikon Coolpix S6900 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6900/Nikon-S6900-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL320 front Samsung TL320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-TL320.jpg)
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB1000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Nikon S6900 and Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the S6900 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The S6900 was announced 6 years after the TL320 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the S6900 scores against the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6900 and Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S6900 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Samsung TL320
S6900 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 73 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Nikon S6900
TL320 | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S6900 and Samsung TL320
S6900 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6900 provides outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S6900 and Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the S6900 vs the TL320.
![Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-vs-Samsung-TL320-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability score of the S6900 and TL320 is 93 and 98 respectively.
![Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-vs-Samsung-TL320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The image below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S6900 and TL320.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon S6900 to give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent S6900 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
![Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-vs-Samsung-TL320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6900-vs-Samsung-TL320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6900 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6900 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.3 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $190 | $380 |